1、Zinc and silicon fertilizers in conventional and nano‐forms: Mitigating

To that end, this study hypothesizes that nano-Zn and nano-Si fertilizers can provide improved salinity stress relief in maize (Zea mays L.) over conventional fertilizers.

2、Differences in crop responses to fertilizers and nanofertilizers

The chapter's objective is to present an updated review of the differences between fertilizers and nanofertilizers, including the differences in the response of crops to each class of nutrient source.

3、The difference between conventional fertilizers and nanofertilizers

These basically consist of the following: (i) increased nutrient absorption and effective usage without larger losses; (ii) a considerable decrease in the danger of environmental contamination as...

4、Nanofertilizers for Sustainable Crop Production: A Comprehensive Review

In this review, the recent advances in nanoformulations as fertilizers are highlighted. It focuses mainly on applying nano-macronutrients, nano-micronutrients, nano-biofertilizer, nano-vermicompost, and nanobiochar in different crops for yield and growth enhancement, better nutrient use efficiency, and sustainability of soil health.

Assessment of nano silicon fertilizer effects on soil nutrients, enzyme

Silicon is widely known for its ability to improve soil texture, suppress pathogenic microbial abundance and promote plant growth. The application of nano materials in agricultural production is becoming more and more extensive.

Nanofertilizers: A Smart and Sustainable Attribute to Modern

These nutrients are bound to the nano-absorbents that are applied either alone or in combination and release the nutrients at a slower rate than that of conventional fertilizers. This approach would minimise nutrient leaching into groundwater and increase the nutrient use efficiency.

Nano Fertilizers Vs Traditional Fertilizers

Nano fertilizers vs traditional fertilizers differ in several aspects, including their composition, mode of action, and potential benefits.

Nanofertilizers versus traditional fertilizers for a sustainable

The goal of this chapter is to share and discuss clear, concise, and easy-to-understand information that illustrates the potential of using nanofertilizers for a sustainable environment and mitigating climate change.

Unveiling the combined effect of nano fertilizers and conventional

However, further research and field trials on nano fertilizers alone or in combination with conventional fertilizers are essential to fully unlock its benefits and ascertain its long-term effects which may offer a pathway to more efficient and eco-friendly crop nourishment.

Silicon as a Smart Fertilizer for Sustainability and Crop Improvement

In this review, we provide an overview of different smart fertilizer types, application of Si fertilizers in agriculture, availability of Si fertilizers, and experiments conducted in...

The differences between micro-nano silicon fertilizer and conventional silicon fertilizer are primarily reflected in the following aspects:

1. Composition Differences: The main component of micro-nano silicon fertilizer is silicon, while conventional silicon fertilizer primarily consists of silicate. In micro-nano silicon fertilizer, silicon exists in the form of silicate at the micro or nano scale, whereas in conventional silicon fertilizer, silicon also exists as silicate but with larger particle sizes.

2. Physical Form Differences: Silicon in micro-nano fertilizer is present as silicate particles at the micrometer or nanometer level, while silicon in conventional fertilizer exists as silicate with larger particle sizes.

3. Absorption and Utilization Rate: Due to its micro or nano-scale silicate form, micro-nano silicon fertilizer has a higher absorption and utilization rate. In contrast, conventional silicon fertilizer, with its larger silicate particles, exhibits relatively lower absorption efficiency.

4. Soil Improvement Effects: Micro-nano silicon fertilizer can improve soil structure, enhance water-retention capacity, and boost crop growth speed and yield. Conventional silicon fertilizer mainly supplements soil with silicon but has limited effects on soil structure improvement.

5. Environmental Impact: During application, micro-nano silicon fertilizer’s small particle size allows for easier plant absorption, reducing environmental pollution. Conventional silicon fertilizer, due to its larger particle size, may be less efficiently absorbed by plants, potentially leading to environmental contamination.

6. Price Differences: Micro-nano silicon fertilizer has higher production costs, resulting in a higher market price. Conventional silicon fertilizer, with lower production costs, is generally more affordable.

7. Application Methods: Micro-nano silicon fertilizer typically appears as a liquid or powder and can be directly sprayed onto crops or mixed into soil. Conventional silicon fertilizer often requires blending with other fertilizers before use.

8. Suitable Crops: Micro-nano silicon fertilizer is suitable for various crops, especially those requiring high silicon supplementation, such as rice and wheat. Conventional silicon fertilizer is more commonly used for crops like corn and soybeans, which also benefit from silicon supplementation.

9. Usage Methods: Applying micro-nano silicon fertilizer is straightforward: simply spray the liquid or powder onto crops or incorporate it into soil. Conventional silicon fertilizer requires specific application methods as outlined in product instructions.

10. Storage Conditions: Micro-nano silicon fertilizer requires strict storage conditions, such as cool, dry places away from sunlight and heat. Conventional silicon fertilizer can be stored more flexibly, generally in shaded or indoor areas.

despite both being silicon fertilizers, micro-nano and conventional types differ significantly in composition, physical form, absorption efficiency, soil improvement effects, environmental impact, cost, application methods, suitable crops, usage procedures, and storage requirements. when selecting silicon fertilizer, choices should be based on crop requirements and soil conditions.